November 24th, 1859. The day “the origin of species” got published and the world was introduced with a unique theory of existence, reasons of existence and the processes of generation, evolution, and survival of different species. The oldest and with everlasting longevity were amoeba and others of the similar kind. They have been through all the ups and downs; through the rough phases presented by Mother Nature.
“The origin of species” was one of a kind book, written to target everyone, be read and comprehended by anyone. It was liked and had been popular among all the classes, be it students, researchers, scientists or visionaries. It was popular worldwide because of its neutral approach and comprehensive language. The theories are still applicable and the book was proved helpful for future biological and relative theoretical experiments and practical applications regarding the origin and evolution of different species on the planet earth.
The relative similarity between “the origin of species” and blockchain:
If Satoshi Nakamoto is “Darwin” of Crypto Age, and the cryptography is “the origin of species”, considering the fact that it all exists in the very world we all live and has a significant effect worldwide. It has been comprehended, eventually although, by almost the whole world, yet has turned out to be a popular and widely accepted phenomenon.
While other cryptocurrencies failed to survive and have lost their existence in the winds of change and evolution, just like the earlier “single-cell” organisms, before amoeba. Bitcoin, being the fittest of species, has been the “amoeba” of this relative hypothesis. It has been the cause, inspiration, and benchmark for other, more complex organisms to follow it. These organisms, Ethereum for instance, were introduced with a new concept of execution, which was ICO (initial coin offering). Relatively, natural principles of development, nutrition, growth, and reproduction have been prevalent and known to all.
The discussions, scientific and religious, in the time and for long:
“The origin of species” gave birth to various hot discussions, scientific-practical, and religious-orthodox, and similarly has blockchain. The Orthodox community, or the religious groups’ dominant at that time, were not flexible enough to allow any new theories to be prevailing in the society they had been ruling since long. Likewise, the financial system which has been dominant since the society had been introduced with money and currency, doesn’t wish to change and is rigid to its set trends since a couple of centuries. It’s perhaps afraid of the importance it might lose if its principles would be replaced.
The book had conspired for a long time, and that reign is popularly known as “the eclipse of Darwinism”, i.e. from the 1880s to 1930s. Despite all the evidence and explanations, “the origin of species” was kept from the “acceptance” by the “responsible” for quite a long time. People were restricted from talking about “Darwin’s theories” in public or on social platforms. The current time frame could be compared to the same reign, where people could not talk about “cryptography” in the financial meetings or the forums related with centralized banks or finance related social platforms, where monopoly is a butler to the big old banks and credit companies.
The co-existence and definition of “EVOLUTION”:
Likewise, there came a number of other enthusiasts, with new icons which turned to crypto coins on exchanges, and similar theories on the world’s evolution, after “the origin of species”. The Darwin’s theory was then found and proved to be practical and applicable, rather helpful in new biological findings. Similarly, the concept of ICO (initial coin offering) was introduced to the world. This led to a revolution, by opening doors of participation, monetarily, of “non-technical” individuals in the crypto world.
Like earlier, the concept has been questioned, has been challenged and unfortunately, because of a few irregularities and initial failures in the execution of some applications, (liber forex was although a very small ratio compared to the successful ones), the critics got a chance to celebrate.
ICO-TIN, THE AFTERLIFE FOR “DARWIN”:
“The origin of species”, later was comparatively found to be almost a definition and explanation of the evolution of different species on earth. It was also explained, that what was the difference between the habitats of earth, to other planets probably, because of which, the LIFE was not probably possible elsewhere. Darwin didn’t talk about that; neither did Nakamoto, about “ICOs”.
The ICOs have been challenged as a concept by authorities and “religious” bodies worldwide. These “religious” (rigid to the principles and unhappy to change) financial systems have their own limits. They make rigid mandates for every new integration or experiment, introduction or invention within the system. These mandates tend to be a “dead-end” for ICOs these days.
To provide a window in that “dead-end” for ICOs, and with more explanations and integrations to that “rigid mandate” policy of “religious bodies”, ICO-TIN has to come in picture. To provide the indispensable habitat for ICOs, and to make “Earth” different from other planets, ICO-TIN makes a safe mid-way between the progressive ICOs and the “religious” old financial systems.